Lydia’s Conversion in Philippi
11 From Troas we put out to sea and sailed straight for Samothrace, and the next day we went on to Neapolis. 12 From there we traveled to Philippi, a Roman colony and the leading city of that district[a] of Macedonia. And we stayed there several days.
13 On the Sabbath we went outside the city gate to the river, where we expected to find a place of prayer. We sat down and began to speak to the women who had gathered there. 14 One of those listening was a woman from the city of Thyatira named Lydia, a dealer in purple cloth. She was a worshiper of God. The Lord opened her heart to respond to Paul’s message. 15 When she and the members of her household were baptized, she invited us to her home. “If you consider me a believer in the Lord,” she said, “come and stay at my house.” And she persuaded us.
Paul and Silas in Prison
16 Once when we were going to the place of prayer, we were met by a female slave who had a spirit by which she predicted the future. She earned a great deal of money for her owners by fortune-telling. 17 She followed Paul and the rest of us, shouting, “These men are servants of the Most High God, who are telling you the way to be saved.” 18 She kept this up for many days. Finally Paul became so annoyed that he turned around and said to the spirit, “In the name of Jesus Christ I command you to come out of her!” At that moment the spirit left her.
19 When her owners realized that their hope of making money was gone, they seized Paul and Silas and dragged them into the marketplace to face the authorities. 20 They brought them before the magistrates and said, “These men are Jews, and are throwing our city into an uproar 21 by advocating customs unlawful for us Romans to accept or practice.”
22 The crowd joined in the attack against Paul and Silas, and the magistrates ordered them to be stripped and beaten with rods. 23 After they had been severely flogged, they were thrown into prison, and the jailer was commanded to guard them carefully. 24 When he received these orders, he put them in the inner cell and fastened their feet in the stocks.
Dig Deeper
The state in which I live has gone through a tremendous amount of conflict and political intrigue in the last year. It all began, believe it or not, with a seemingly simple law from the new governor that public employees begin to contribute more to their retirement funds and health care plans due to the fact that the state was on the verge of financial insolvency. There have been cost-saving measures before both suggested and real but never had they received a response like this one got. The union leadership in our state went crazy and began to fight against these measures violently. They whipped their supporters into a frenzy and they basically took over the capitol building for weeks with coloful and rowdy protests. Politicians who supported them even spirited themselves out of the state and hid out so that the legislature could not be called into session to pass the bills.
What was intriguing about the fierce nature of the opposition was why it was so intense. Everyone agreed that the state was broke and something had to be done. Part of the proposal was that these unions would not be able to negotiate these areas in their contracts so that the cutbacks in state funding couldn’t just be averted in future contract negotiations. Many claimed that this was the problem, but most states and the federal employees don’t have these same negotiation rights so it would seem unlikely that this was the real cause. Slowly the real problem became apparent as to why the unions were so violently opposed to these seemingly common-sense measures. Part of the law proposed by the governor included the stipulation that employees could no longer be forced to be a part of a union at their workplace or have union dues taken from their paychecks automatically. They would have to choose to pay their dues and be part of their union. Now people can have different political opinions and that’s fine. In fact the point of this is not at all to be political. The reality here seemed to be, though, that the true cause of the violent opposition was that little stipulation which would all but wipe out the power of public sector unions. Whether you support them or oppose them, that was the real issue. If you mess with people’s money, you will get a fight but mess with their power and position and you will have a fight to the death on your hands.
As Paul and his companions went around ancient Asia, Turkey, and Greece preaching the gospel they knew that they were going to face opposition at nearly every turn but every now and then they would come directly into confrontation with the power source of a city or region. If you messed with that, the powers-that-be understood the danger to them and they would come out fighting fiercely. The punch-back can be brutal and Paul was about to experience that in a big way.
When they arrived in Philippi, things started out well. You couldn’t just go into most cities in the ancient world, especially Roman colonies like Philippi and walk up and down the street preaching whatever you wanted. That could be quite dangerous . Things would go much better to have some sort of place from which to preach, a base of operations so to speak. That’s at least one of the reasons that Paul would typically go to a synagogue in a city first and start preaching there. But Philippi apparently had no synagogue. There were so few Jews in Philippi that all Paul could find was a group of Jewish women who would gather together to pray regularly. Jews could not and would not start a synagogue without at least ten men, so these faithful women were doing the best that they could under the circumstances with what seems to have been a lack of the necessary number of men. So Paul found this place and began to preach to the women.
Special attention is paid to a woman who came from Thyatira in the region of Lydia which is likely why she was called Lydia. She was a merchant in purple cloth which meant that, to put it in today’s terms, you would not find her items at the local Wal-Mart. This was high end merchandise and it implies that Lydia was probably a rather wealthy and influential business woman, despite that fact that she was almost surely either unmarried or a widow.
Lydia was a God-fearer (worshipper of God) which meant that she was a Gentile that found something in the Jewish faith that went beyond the pagan religions with which she grew up. Yet she had not become a full-proselyte Jew. When Lydia heard the gospel preached she experienced an opening of her heart. Luke stressed the two-fold aspect of reconciling with God that is necessary for all who would hear his call. God must first open our blind eyes and soften our hardened hearts through his grace. This is what John Wesley referred to as prevenient grace. But God’s grace is not forced upon anyone, it is an opportunity. Given the opportunity, Lydia responded to God’s grace with obedience and humility by being baptized into the life and body of Christ (see Rom. 6:1-10; 1 Cor. 12:13).
Once she had been baptized into Christ, she was a believer and part of the family and now sought to help out her new brothers. They could use her house as a base of operations in Philippi. A new influential and important convert (in fact she was the first convert in Europe) and a place from which to work, things were starting to look up in Philippi. But the calm comes before the storm and the powers of darkness were about to amass rather quickly.
Just because they had a place to stay and work from though, did not mean that they would stop going to the prayer place, which was probably used by more than just Jews in the area. As they arrived they came upon a woman possessed by a spirit. The text is changed by most English versions to make it more accessible (in their estimation) to English readers, but the manuscripts actually read that this woman was possessed by the spirit of the Python. This meant that she was a follower of Apollo that engaged in oracles and fortune-telling. This woman was no scam artist. She was likely truly possessed by a demon spirit that gave her uncanny abilities.
Her response to Paul and his companions was reminiscent of the demonic response to Jesus who attempted to identify and name Jesus and his mission in an attempt to show superiority and dominance over him. This young woman began to follow them and scream at them. We can only imagine how annoying that would have quickly become, yet Luke doesn’t tell us why Paul let this go on for several days without any response. It is difficult to speculate but finally Paul became quite vexed and showed that this spirit did not have dominance over them at all. At the very mention of the authority of Jesus Christ, the spirit left and was gone. This woman had been healed and the situation fixed.
At least that would seem to us to be the logical conclusion to what happened. But this young slave girl had become quite a source of money, power, and prestige for her owners and Paul had unknowingly stepped into a hornet’s nest by messing with the economics and power of these people. Without the spirit of python in this girl, their position of power was under attack. But the dark demonic forces at work also knew the danger of the gospel taking foot in this town founded by retired Roman soldiers.
Paul and Silas were quickly going to bear the brunt of crossing the self-interests of the powers of darkness. They had not only threatened the economic and religious sensibilities of this deeply pagan Roman colony but there were also political undertones to all of this. How dare these Jews come in and tried to tell Romans what to do. Imagine a group of Jews declaring that they possessed some sort of freeing truth that Romans did not possess. How dare they.
They made the assumption that these were not Roman citizens and could treated as sub-standard interlopers but little did they know that Paul and Silas were both Roman citizens. Yet they did not bring this to light at this point. This is another mystery as to why they didn’t (although the reason might become more apparent in the next section) but things got ugly quickly and perhaps there was just no opportunity to do so. The magistrates ordered them stripped and beaten with rods, a punishment that was severe and swift.
One might ask at this point why Paul and Silas would endure such treatment but his answer to that mystery came in 1 Thessalonians 2:2-4: “We had previously suffered and been treated outrageously in Philippi, as you know, but with the help of our God we dared to tell you his gospel in the face of strong opposition. For the appeal we make does not spring from error or impure motives, nor are we trying to trick you. On the contrary, we speak as those approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel. We are not trying to please people but God, who tests our hearts.”
As if that wasn’t enough, they were then thrown in jail under the guard of a jailer who was under strict orders to ensure that they didn’t escape. This jailer quickly proved to be no friend of theirs as he chained them up which would have been very restrictive and kept them from lying down or moving much at all. The jailer seemed quite willing to treat them harshly and show them no mercy.
Paul and Silas had taken on the forces of darkness and had paid dearly. They had shared in the suffering of their Messiah and things seemed like they couldn’t get much worse but when the powers of evil are their most ferocious and things seem the bleakest, that’s when God often does his best work. Paul, Silas, and that jailer would all soon find that out.
Devotional Thought
When things in your life go badly as they did for Paul and Silas in Philippi where does your mindset go? Do you start to feel badly for yourself or do you get excited to see what God is about to do in your life?
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Monday, July 25, 2011
Acts 16:1-10
Timothy Joins Paul and Silas
1 Paul came to Derbe and then to Lystra, where a disciple named Timothy lived, whose mother was Jewish and a believer but whose father was a Greek. 2 The believers at Lystra and Iconium spoke well of him. 3 Paul wanted to take him along on the journey, so he circumcised him because of the Jews who lived in that area, for they all knew that his father was a Greek. 4 As they traveled from town to town, they delivered the decisions reached by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem for the people to obey. 5 So the churches were strengthened in the faith and grew daily in numbers.
Paul’s Vision of the Man of Macedonia
6 Paul and his companions traveled throughout the region of Phrygia and Galatia, having been kept by the Holy Spirit from preaching the word in the province of Asia. 7 When they came to the border of Mysia, they tried to enter Bithynia, but the Spirit of Jesus would not allow them to. 8 So they passed by Mysia and went down to Troas. 9 During the night Paul had a vision of a man of Macedonia standing and begging him, “Come over to Macedonia and help us.” 10 After Paul had seen the vision, we got ready at once to leave for Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them.
Dig Deeper
Coming out of college I was quite decidedly not a Christian and I wanted to be a teacher and historian for the rest of my life. Then my life changed fairly radically when I became a true disciple of Jesus Christ. I continued to be a teacher and coach for awhile but my priorities had changed and God’s kingdom had become the most important thing in my life with my roles as a teacher and coach simply becoming the context for me being a Christian and expanding the kingdom of God. My vocation as a teacher was no longer the most important thing in my life. Then I began to feel the call to go full-time into the work of the ministry and to leave teaching as my profession. This was a subtle calling, though, based on the input and advice of other people. Based on their opinions, I began to seek out God’s will through prayer and reflection and that seemed to also be guiding me towards going into the ministry. Yet at no time was it absolutely clear. It was a big decision to make, to leave what I thought I was going to do for my entire life to go a completely different direction. It would have been easy if the choice was obvious but it wasn’t. In fact, I had people tell me that they thought I should pursue God’s calling but wanted me to know that there were little to no actual ministry opportunities in our fellowship of churches where I was at and wouldn’t be in the foreseeable future. It’s one thing to walk across a bridge but it’s another thing to step out over a canyon on faith, hoping that a bridge will appear by the time your weight has shifted and your foot has stepped out into what looks like nothing but air.
Following the Spirit’s guidance and finding God’s will is a tricky thing. It’s not nearly as obvious as we would like. The reality is that the Spirit often leads us into blind alleys and demands a great deal of faith on our part. That’s what makes it so difficult to follow the leading of the Spirit. It’s generally not obvious. It can be, quite frankly, agonizing. We want to follow the Spirit or it wouldn’t be an issue at all, but how do we know this is the Spirit’s will and not ours? How do we know that this is not just us convincing ourselves to do something that we just really want to do? How do we know that we aren’t about to do something wildly foolish that wasn’t what God wanted at all? The questions to those answers don’t come easy but we can rest assured that our brothers and sisters in the book of Acts struggled with the same issues. They were constantly on the edge being led by a Spirit who seems far more dangerous than we would care to experience.
Luke doesn’t say specifically whether the decision to bring Timothy along with them on Paul’s missionary journey was a difficult one or not but it doesn’t take much speculation to know that it probably was a difficult decision. Paul had taken the young man John Mark with him before on a missionary journey and been burned badly when things got too difficult for Mark and he turned around went home. On top of that Paul had just went through a difficult disagreement and parting of the ways with his long-time friend and supporter Barnabas. Now he had chosen Silas, a man with whom he must have clearly connected on their trip from Jerusalem to Antioch and through the time that Silas stayed and ministered to Paul’s church in Antioch. Silas was a shortened term for his full name “Silvanus.” and he was almost assuredly the same man who co-authored 1 & 2 Thessalonians and was the scribe for 1 Peter (1 Pet. 5:12).
It seems that Silas would take the role left by the departure of Barnabas and now they were presumably taking Timothy to fill a similar role that Mark had filled on the previous journey. But it is unlikely that this decision was easy or obvious. Would Timothy do well on this demanding and difficult trek? Was he really the Spirit’s choice? Certainly Paul labored over his decision in prayer and sought the guidance of the Spirit. Then came that time when you have to step out in faith and act on the assurance that you have done your very best to seek the input of the Spirit and other believers.
There certainly would have been a fair amount of evidence for Paul to consider that Timothy was a reliable man of God, albeit very young, and that he was indeed the Spirit’s choice. Timothy had apparently been converted on Paul’s previous trip to this area (cf. 1 Cor. 4:17). His mother Eunice and grandmother Lois were both beloved Christians (2 Timothy 1:5) but his father was a Greek man who was not a Christian and was, it seems, dead by this time. Timothy, though a young man, was already being spoken well of by the Christians in his home area as he was already probably displaying the type of character that Paul described when he said of Timothy that “I have no one else like him, who will show genuine concern for your welfare. For everyone looks out for their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ” (Phil. 2:20).
But once Paul had decided to take Timothy with him, there was one problem. He would have been considered an apostate Jew by other Jews because he was not circumcised. This could have proved to be a severe obstacle in his ministry trip with Paul so Paul encouraged him to go through the painful step of circumcision. Some see this, at least on the surface, as a contradiction for Paul who was so adamant that circumcision was not necessary for people to be part of God’s family. Paul was dead set against a Gentile like Titus having circumcision forced upon him (Gal. 2:3-5) and was crystal clear that it could not be required for believers who needed nothing more than the faith of being baptized in the life of Christ (Gal. 5:6; cf. Gal. 3:26-29). Ultimately, though, Paul was rather ambivalent about circumcision itself (Gal. 6:15; 1 Cor. 7:19). Paul was not against circumcision. He was against it as a requirement to be recognized as part of God’s family. But Paul was never one to hold blindly to simplistic consistency when a more sophisticated and mature line of thinking was required. He knew that general salvation and ministry have different requirements. There was no thought that Timothy needed circumcision to be in Christ but it was essential in order for him to be heard and accepted by the Jews in the places where they were going to share the gospel. What is not required for salvation can often be necessary for the spreading of the gospel (just as a degree in some sort of biblical studies program is not required to be a Christian but I have met many people who will not go to a church if the minister doesn’t have exactly that sort of training). This was one of those times.
Paul’s new missionary team began to travel around telling the other Gentile churches of the decision that had been made in Jerusalem, something that must have been a source of great joy for the believers everywhere, especially the Gentile believers. They evidently intended on continuing on into Asia to preach the gospel but, says Luke, the Holy Spirit not only kept them from going there but also deterred them from entering into Mysia to share the gospel as well although he doesn’t say why. Nor does Luke tell us what the nature of the Spirit’s guidance was here. It may have come through the means of prophecy, the inward guidance and resolve of the Spirit through prayer, or through external circumstances.
Paul’s journeys were a constant exercise in learning to follow the subtle guidance of the Holy Spirit and trust that they were doing the right thing. But is must have been very confusing and a great struggle to have plans to go into certain areas, only to become convinced that the Spirit was guiding them in another direction. Following the Spirit is easy when it’s obvious but it rarely ever is obvious, and we must assume that it was no easier for Paul and his companions than for us. So they prayed constantly and sought the Spirit’s guidance at every turn no matter how difficult and challenging his leading and prompting might be.
Just when they must have been wondering where in the world the Spirit did want them to go, Paul had a dream of a Macedonian man calling to him to come over to Macedonia and help. This would be a whole new area for the gospel to spread but it still must have been a difficult and challenging call for Paul. Was this dream the genuine prompting of the Spirit or was it just a dream? But these people needed help and Paul and his companions had the exact cure for that problem.
One other important thing apparently happened for Paul and his missionary team during their brief stay in Troas in addition to the dream. For the first time in the book of Acts the narrator switches from using the third person and begins to employ the term “we.” There several possibilities for this switch but the most likely and logical one is that Luke, the physician (Col. 4:14), joined the team in Troas. Although Luke is subtle and does not seek to bring any attention to himself, the team is now complete. Like an action movie that slowly assembles all of the pieces together before they move into the main part of the plot, Paul’s team is now set for the next part of their journey.
Devotional Thought
Do you ever find it difficult to find and follow the Spirit’s will in your life? What do you do in those times? How do you determine what the Spirit’s will is for you? Take some time to reflect and pray about that and ensure that your methods are biblical ones.
1 Paul came to Derbe and then to Lystra, where a disciple named Timothy lived, whose mother was Jewish and a believer but whose father was a Greek. 2 The believers at Lystra and Iconium spoke well of him. 3 Paul wanted to take him along on the journey, so he circumcised him because of the Jews who lived in that area, for they all knew that his father was a Greek. 4 As they traveled from town to town, they delivered the decisions reached by the apostles and elders in Jerusalem for the people to obey. 5 So the churches were strengthened in the faith and grew daily in numbers.
Paul’s Vision of the Man of Macedonia
6 Paul and his companions traveled throughout the region of Phrygia and Galatia, having been kept by the Holy Spirit from preaching the word in the province of Asia. 7 When they came to the border of Mysia, they tried to enter Bithynia, but the Spirit of Jesus would not allow them to. 8 So they passed by Mysia and went down to Troas. 9 During the night Paul had a vision of a man of Macedonia standing and begging him, “Come over to Macedonia and help us.” 10 After Paul had seen the vision, we got ready at once to leave for Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them.
Dig Deeper
Coming out of college I was quite decidedly not a Christian and I wanted to be a teacher and historian for the rest of my life. Then my life changed fairly radically when I became a true disciple of Jesus Christ. I continued to be a teacher and coach for awhile but my priorities had changed and God’s kingdom had become the most important thing in my life with my roles as a teacher and coach simply becoming the context for me being a Christian and expanding the kingdom of God. My vocation as a teacher was no longer the most important thing in my life. Then I began to feel the call to go full-time into the work of the ministry and to leave teaching as my profession. This was a subtle calling, though, based on the input and advice of other people. Based on their opinions, I began to seek out God’s will through prayer and reflection and that seemed to also be guiding me towards going into the ministry. Yet at no time was it absolutely clear. It was a big decision to make, to leave what I thought I was going to do for my entire life to go a completely different direction. It would have been easy if the choice was obvious but it wasn’t. In fact, I had people tell me that they thought I should pursue God’s calling but wanted me to know that there were little to no actual ministry opportunities in our fellowship of churches where I was at and wouldn’t be in the foreseeable future. It’s one thing to walk across a bridge but it’s another thing to step out over a canyon on faith, hoping that a bridge will appear by the time your weight has shifted and your foot has stepped out into what looks like nothing but air.
Following the Spirit’s guidance and finding God’s will is a tricky thing. It’s not nearly as obvious as we would like. The reality is that the Spirit often leads us into blind alleys and demands a great deal of faith on our part. That’s what makes it so difficult to follow the leading of the Spirit. It’s generally not obvious. It can be, quite frankly, agonizing. We want to follow the Spirit or it wouldn’t be an issue at all, but how do we know this is the Spirit’s will and not ours? How do we know that this is not just us convincing ourselves to do something that we just really want to do? How do we know that we aren’t about to do something wildly foolish that wasn’t what God wanted at all? The questions to those answers don’t come easy but we can rest assured that our brothers and sisters in the book of Acts struggled with the same issues. They were constantly on the edge being led by a Spirit who seems far more dangerous than we would care to experience.
Luke doesn’t say specifically whether the decision to bring Timothy along with them on Paul’s missionary journey was a difficult one or not but it doesn’t take much speculation to know that it probably was a difficult decision. Paul had taken the young man John Mark with him before on a missionary journey and been burned badly when things got too difficult for Mark and he turned around went home. On top of that Paul had just went through a difficult disagreement and parting of the ways with his long-time friend and supporter Barnabas. Now he had chosen Silas, a man with whom he must have clearly connected on their trip from Jerusalem to Antioch and through the time that Silas stayed and ministered to Paul’s church in Antioch. Silas was a shortened term for his full name “Silvanus.” and he was almost assuredly the same man who co-authored 1 & 2 Thessalonians and was the scribe for 1 Peter (1 Pet. 5:12).
It seems that Silas would take the role left by the departure of Barnabas and now they were presumably taking Timothy to fill a similar role that Mark had filled on the previous journey. But it is unlikely that this decision was easy or obvious. Would Timothy do well on this demanding and difficult trek? Was he really the Spirit’s choice? Certainly Paul labored over his decision in prayer and sought the guidance of the Spirit. Then came that time when you have to step out in faith and act on the assurance that you have done your very best to seek the input of the Spirit and other believers.
There certainly would have been a fair amount of evidence for Paul to consider that Timothy was a reliable man of God, albeit very young, and that he was indeed the Spirit’s choice. Timothy had apparently been converted on Paul’s previous trip to this area (cf. 1 Cor. 4:17). His mother Eunice and grandmother Lois were both beloved Christians (2 Timothy 1:5) but his father was a Greek man who was not a Christian and was, it seems, dead by this time. Timothy, though a young man, was already being spoken well of by the Christians in his home area as he was already probably displaying the type of character that Paul described when he said of Timothy that “I have no one else like him, who will show genuine concern for your welfare. For everyone looks out for their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ” (Phil. 2:20).
But once Paul had decided to take Timothy with him, there was one problem. He would have been considered an apostate Jew by other Jews because he was not circumcised. This could have proved to be a severe obstacle in his ministry trip with Paul so Paul encouraged him to go through the painful step of circumcision. Some see this, at least on the surface, as a contradiction for Paul who was so adamant that circumcision was not necessary for people to be part of God’s family. Paul was dead set against a Gentile like Titus having circumcision forced upon him (Gal. 2:3-5) and was crystal clear that it could not be required for believers who needed nothing more than the faith of being baptized in the life of Christ (Gal. 5:6; cf. Gal. 3:26-29). Ultimately, though, Paul was rather ambivalent about circumcision itself (Gal. 6:15; 1 Cor. 7:19). Paul was not against circumcision. He was against it as a requirement to be recognized as part of God’s family. But Paul was never one to hold blindly to simplistic consistency when a more sophisticated and mature line of thinking was required. He knew that general salvation and ministry have different requirements. There was no thought that Timothy needed circumcision to be in Christ but it was essential in order for him to be heard and accepted by the Jews in the places where they were going to share the gospel. What is not required for salvation can often be necessary for the spreading of the gospel (just as a degree in some sort of biblical studies program is not required to be a Christian but I have met many people who will not go to a church if the minister doesn’t have exactly that sort of training). This was one of those times.
Paul’s new missionary team began to travel around telling the other Gentile churches of the decision that had been made in Jerusalem, something that must have been a source of great joy for the believers everywhere, especially the Gentile believers. They evidently intended on continuing on into Asia to preach the gospel but, says Luke, the Holy Spirit not only kept them from going there but also deterred them from entering into Mysia to share the gospel as well although he doesn’t say why. Nor does Luke tell us what the nature of the Spirit’s guidance was here. It may have come through the means of prophecy, the inward guidance and resolve of the Spirit through prayer, or through external circumstances.
Paul’s journeys were a constant exercise in learning to follow the subtle guidance of the Holy Spirit and trust that they were doing the right thing. But is must have been very confusing and a great struggle to have plans to go into certain areas, only to become convinced that the Spirit was guiding them in another direction. Following the Spirit is easy when it’s obvious but it rarely ever is obvious, and we must assume that it was no easier for Paul and his companions than for us. So they prayed constantly and sought the Spirit’s guidance at every turn no matter how difficult and challenging his leading and prompting might be.
Just when they must have been wondering where in the world the Spirit did want them to go, Paul had a dream of a Macedonian man calling to him to come over to Macedonia and help. This would be a whole new area for the gospel to spread but it still must have been a difficult and challenging call for Paul. Was this dream the genuine prompting of the Spirit or was it just a dream? But these people needed help and Paul and his companions had the exact cure for that problem.
One other important thing apparently happened for Paul and his missionary team during their brief stay in Troas in addition to the dream. For the first time in the book of Acts the narrator switches from using the third person and begins to employ the term “we.” There several possibilities for this switch but the most likely and logical one is that Luke, the physician (Col. 4:14), joined the team in Troas. Although Luke is subtle and does not seek to bring any attention to himself, the team is now complete. Like an action movie that slowly assembles all of the pieces together before they move into the main part of the plot, Paul’s team is now set for the next part of their journey.
Devotional Thought
Do you ever find it difficult to find and follow the Spirit’s will in your life? What do you do in those times? How do you determine what the Spirit’s will is for you? Take some time to reflect and pray about that and ensure that your methods are biblical ones.
Friday, July 22, 2011
Acts 15:36-41
Disagreement Between Paul and Barnabas
36 Some time later Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us go back and visit the believers in all the towns where we preached the word of the Lord and see how they are doing.” 37 Barnabas wanted to take John, also called Mark, with them, 38 but Paul did not think it wise to take him, because he had deserted them in Pamphylia and had not continued with them in the work. 39 They had such a sharp disagreement that they parted company. Barnabas took Mark and sailed for Cyprus, 40 but Paul chose Silas and left, commended by the believers to the grace of the Lord. 41 He went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.
Dig Deeper
As Christians we know that we are called to love and unity. We are called by Scripture to be of the same mind with one another. Does this mean, however, that we will never have conflict or disagreements with other brothers? Of course, reality and experience tell us that this will not be the case. But what should we think of such situations? How should we respond? We find some important lessons to be learned in response to those types of questions in one of the more stunning passages in all of the New Testament. At the end of Acts 15, two great brothers in the faith who had worked together faithfully for years coming into such sharp disagreement that they felt it necessary to part ways and split their ministry. Rather than just viewing this as a sad and unfortunate blight on the early church, we must realize that it was a very important time from which we can learn invaluable lessons that will guide us through some of our most difficult times today.
In Acts 15 we are told of a decision by Paul and Barnabas to go back through their previously traveled ground and strengthen the churches (Acts 15:36). Out of this decision, however, a sharp disagreement arose between these two dear brothers over what we today might call their ministry philosophy. Barnabas thought that it would be a good idea to bring Mark with them but Paul thought quite differently.
Mark was the son of a Christian woman named Mary (Acts 12:12) and the cousin of Barnabas (Col. 4:10). He had been with these two great men of the faith on a previous missionary journey but abandoned the mission in Pamphylia to return to Jerusalem for unstated reasons (Acts 13:13; 15:38).
The difference in opinion may seem like a small one to use standing on the far-off peak of a mountain separated by a valley of nearly 2,000 years, but the disagreement was sharp enough that it cause the two brothers with such a long history together (Barnabas had initially vouched for Paul and caused him to be accepted by wary and fearful Christians who thought Paul’s conversion might be a plot, and had invited him into the ministry in Antioch) to part ways and apparently never work closely together again.
One of the questions that we humans always seem to need to know in a disagreement of this nature is who was in the right and who was in the wrong. That is a particularly difficult question when it comes to this issue because this was not a case of doctrinal purity or heresy in the camp. It was a difference of opinion over which aspect of the Scriptures to emphasize in this particular case. The difficult aspect of this situation is that a case can be made that both men were in the right in one sense, a situation that often leads to the most intense disagreements.
When we look at Paul’s argument it seems to have been sound and logical. Mark had been with them and failed. We don’t know the details but it is safe to assume that it greatly affected Paul and it was probably rather damaging at the time to their mission. After all, no one who puts his hand to plow and starts looking back is fit for the kingdom, right? (Lk. 9:62). There is a great danger in putting trust into one who has proven himself to be unreliable (Prov. 25:19) and being faithful is an absolute requirement for ministry in the kingdom of God (1 Tim. 1:12; 1 Cor. 4:2).
Acts 15:40 seems to imply that the church, at least in some initial way, may have agreed with Paul. Paul and Silas were commended by the brothers as they left but no mention is made of Barnabas and Mark. It may have merely been decided, though, that Paul would continue on the official mission while Barnabas was breaking away from that and going to cover ground that was not on the initial itinerary but would still be beneficial and would enable more ground to be covered in the long run. It might also simply mean that despite Paul’s breaking away from Barnabas, Luke emphasizes that the church was not going to cut Paul off and would support his journey, while their support of Barnabas would go without saying.
But before we jump to Paul’s side in this, we should consider Proverbs 18:17 which reminds us that the first to present his case seems like the way to go until another comes along and presents his case. Let’s look at this from the perspective of Barnabas. We are not told specifically of Barnabas’ reasons but based on his previous actions they are not too difficult to presume. It is safe to say that Barnabas was not defending Mark’s actions but he wanted to give him a second chance. Past sin and failure do not determine the future potential for faithfulness although they do need to be taken into account. I would be willing to bet that Barnabas might have pointed to Jesus giving Peter and all of the apostles a second chance after their initial failures. I would also imagine that Barnabas would have mentioned the times when he believed in Paul and gave him chances when very few others were willing. The Christian principles of forgiveness and grace seem to have been at the forefront of Barnabas’ beliefs and actions.
So who is right? You may have already come down on one side or the other, but I don’t think it’s necessary here. The Bible doesn’t clearly take any sides and neither must we. This seems to be one of those cases where the issue was a disagreement in which scriptural principles to emphasize. It was an honest to goodness difference in ministerial philosophy. There seems to have been no sin involved. Despite this dispute and subsequent parting of the ways of two great heroes in the faith, God’s kingdom continued on stronger than ever and both men were used powerfully by God. It is through situations like this, however, that we can learn some very valuable lessons for our own difficult times where issues are so often much more complicated than we would like them to be.
We wish that we didn’t have disagreements among brothers but the reality is that there simply always will be in the present age. Two godly individuals can sharply disagree over the directions of their ministries or whether another brother is ready to be counted on in the ministry, or a nearly endless cavalcade of possibilities but that does not mean that either one is acting in an ungodly manner, even if one or both sides have made mistakes. The reality is that God does not give us answers to every single judgment call that we must make in this age. We will never be free of mistakes and sincere differences of opinions until we all arrive safely in the age to come. Until that time we must firmly bear with one another and “Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace” (Eph. 4:3). There can be differences of opinion and mistakes will be made. That is the reality of the Christian life that we share in together (Phil. 1:6). Many of these differences and even partings of the way will hurt and be painful. Our task, however difficult it may be, is to do what is necessary to keep the bonds of peace and unity through even mistakes.
As Christians we are always called to step forward in love even with those that have hurt us, cursed us, or acted as an enemy. If this is how we are to react to our true enemies, then how much more with our brothers, even when they hurt us or feel like an enemy, or make a rash judgment or offer a harsh word? In fact, when someone most feels like my enemy or has hurt me the most, it is then and to them that I am called by Christ to step forward and show love. Not because I feel like it, but because that is who he is transforming me to be.
There is absolutely no indication or even hint that these two men thought any less of one another although this was surely an emotional time and situation. This was a rupture in their relationship and their ministry. It certainly hurt and could have caused hard feelings but later on we find Paul urging for support for Barnabas in his ministry (1 Cor. 9:6). That verse clearly demonstrates that Paul continued to love, value, and support Barnabas. Just because they could no longer work together did not mean that they did not love one another. Surely Paul and Barnabas made “every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace.”
Although Paul certainly called for Christians to be of one mind in living out the life of Christ and urged that there be no divisions among believers (1 Cor. 1:10-12), that does not mean that there won’t be differences of opinion. It is possible to have differences that even lead to partings of the way without it rupturing the unity and brotherhood of believers. The unity of the family of God must be of higher priority than my opinion or even my brother’s mistakes. That is the Christian life that we all signed up for.
It is significant to note that neither brother is clearly commended or condemned in this parting of the ways. The Bible does not take sides in this issue and we don’t need to either in every situation. That does not mean that we overlook issues or don’t engage in them or help our brothers. It is quite possible, however, to engage in a situation and offer godly input and counsel without taking sides. We can see the right and wrong in both sides of the argument without splitting into different camps. Splitting into different camps is the worldly response to differences of opinion. Commitment to love and unity despite differences and hurt is how the followers of Jesus are to respond.
The separation of Paul and Barnabas might have seemed like a great victory for Satan but that was not the case. Even when we make mistakes, even stupid ones, we must always remember that God is far more powerful than I am stupid. God causes all things to work together for the good of those who love him (Rom. 8:28). That means that if we are all committed to loving God and following him, God can and will work even through our failures and mistakes. We might have disagreements but if we remain righteous even through hard times, God will work powerfully.
In the case of Paul and Barnabas, God took one team of church strengtheners and turned it into two. He doubled the ground that they could cover. It also gave a ministry opportunity to Mark and Silas that might not have been there otherwise. Because of this, more work could be done, more people could engage in the work of the kingdom, and the gospel could be furthered.
It is also true that this disagreement may have been a real struggle and trial for all of those involved, but God uses such situations to teach us strength, perseverance, and to make us complete (Jm. 1:3-4). Even though mistakes may have been made, they could learn from them. Mistakes only become failures when we fail to learn. When we learn from mistakes they become opportunities. For instance, Barnabas may have learned through this disagreement to be more watchful and demanding of Mark which may have had a large hand in the growth that he experienced. Paul may have learned to be more on the look out to be patient and sensitive as he was later in his ministry when it came to the issue between Philemon and Onesimus.
We have shortcomings and we will all fail. The brutal reality is that we all probably have both planks and splinters in our own eyes all of the time. We can play the blame game or we can be active in our unity, brotherhood, forgiveness, growth, and commitment to God’s family. Paul was certainly committed to his decision at the time and it may have worked out for the good, but it is true that he would later change his opinion of Mark. Their disagreement did not cloud his judgment in the future of Mark or their commitment to one another as brothers. He would later call Mark useful and asked that he be brought to help him (1 Tim. 4:11). This must have been very comforting and encouraging for both Mark and Barnabas and a great reminder that they were still brothers in Christ despite their past differences. We will have differences and we will hurt one another; that’s a promise. When the Scriptures call for Christians to bear with one another and forgive one another it is an implicit promise that we will hurt one another. Our love for Christ and our brotherly love can and must triumph.
The mere fact that Luke recorded this sharp disagreement between Paul and Barnabas shows that the church was not ashamed of it. It was a reality and important lessons could be learned. In the same way, we need not be ashamed of differences of opinion or disagreements as though they are all signs of weakness, sin, or disunity. They only become such things when we fail to learn lessons from these times or we fail to put the unity of brotherhood above our own opinion, feelings, and emotions. These are not times to be glossed over and covered up but are times to be openly discussed and learned from in the proper venues for those who are mature enough in their faith to handle such matters.
Devotional Thought
Paul and Barnabas clearly came into conflict but it is also clear that they were both sincerely attempting to put the interests of Christ first. Could you say the same about your relationships and even your conflicts that you come into?
36 Some time later Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us go back and visit the believers in all the towns where we preached the word of the Lord and see how they are doing.” 37 Barnabas wanted to take John, also called Mark, with them, 38 but Paul did not think it wise to take him, because he had deserted them in Pamphylia and had not continued with them in the work. 39 They had such a sharp disagreement that they parted company. Barnabas took Mark and sailed for Cyprus, 40 but Paul chose Silas and left, commended by the believers to the grace of the Lord. 41 He went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.
Dig Deeper
As Christians we know that we are called to love and unity. We are called by Scripture to be of the same mind with one another. Does this mean, however, that we will never have conflict or disagreements with other brothers? Of course, reality and experience tell us that this will not be the case. But what should we think of such situations? How should we respond? We find some important lessons to be learned in response to those types of questions in one of the more stunning passages in all of the New Testament. At the end of Acts 15, two great brothers in the faith who had worked together faithfully for years coming into such sharp disagreement that they felt it necessary to part ways and split their ministry. Rather than just viewing this as a sad and unfortunate blight on the early church, we must realize that it was a very important time from which we can learn invaluable lessons that will guide us through some of our most difficult times today.
In Acts 15 we are told of a decision by Paul and Barnabas to go back through their previously traveled ground and strengthen the churches (Acts 15:36). Out of this decision, however, a sharp disagreement arose between these two dear brothers over what we today might call their ministry philosophy. Barnabas thought that it would be a good idea to bring Mark with them but Paul thought quite differently.
Mark was the son of a Christian woman named Mary (Acts 12:12) and the cousin of Barnabas (Col. 4:10). He had been with these two great men of the faith on a previous missionary journey but abandoned the mission in Pamphylia to return to Jerusalem for unstated reasons (Acts 13:13; 15:38).
The difference in opinion may seem like a small one to use standing on the far-off peak of a mountain separated by a valley of nearly 2,000 years, but the disagreement was sharp enough that it cause the two brothers with such a long history together (Barnabas had initially vouched for Paul and caused him to be accepted by wary and fearful Christians who thought Paul’s conversion might be a plot, and had invited him into the ministry in Antioch) to part ways and apparently never work closely together again.
One of the questions that we humans always seem to need to know in a disagreement of this nature is who was in the right and who was in the wrong. That is a particularly difficult question when it comes to this issue because this was not a case of doctrinal purity or heresy in the camp. It was a difference of opinion over which aspect of the Scriptures to emphasize in this particular case. The difficult aspect of this situation is that a case can be made that both men were in the right in one sense, a situation that often leads to the most intense disagreements.
When we look at Paul’s argument it seems to have been sound and logical. Mark had been with them and failed. We don’t know the details but it is safe to assume that it greatly affected Paul and it was probably rather damaging at the time to their mission. After all, no one who puts his hand to plow and starts looking back is fit for the kingdom, right? (Lk. 9:62). There is a great danger in putting trust into one who has proven himself to be unreliable (Prov. 25:19) and being faithful is an absolute requirement for ministry in the kingdom of God (1 Tim. 1:12; 1 Cor. 4:2).
Acts 15:40 seems to imply that the church, at least in some initial way, may have agreed with Paul. Paul and Silas were commended by the brothers as they left but no mention is made of Barnabas and Mark. It may have merely been decided, though, that Paul would continue on the official mission while Barnabas was breaking away from that and going to cover ground that was not on the initial itinerary but would still be beneficial and would enable more ground to be covered in the long run. It might also simply mean that despite Paul’s breaking away from Barnabas, Luke emphasizes that the church was not going to cut Paul off and would support his journey, while their support of Barnabas would go without saying.
But before we jump to Paul’s side in this, we should consider Proverbs 18:17 which reminds us that the first to present his case seems like the way to go until another comes along and presents his case. Let’s look at this from the perspective of Barnabas. We are not told specifically of Barnabas’ reasons but based on his previous actions they are not too difficult to presume. It is safe to say that Barnabas was not defending Mark’s actions but he wanted to give him a second chance. Past sin and failure do not determine the future potential for faithfulness although they do need to be taken into account. I would be willing to bet that Barnabas might have pointed to Jesus giving Peter and all of the apostles a second chance after their initial failures. I would also imagine that Barnabas would have mentioned the times when he believed in Paul and gave him chances when very few others were willing. The Christian principles of forgiveness and grace seem to have been at the forefront of Barnabas’ beliefs and actions.
So who is right? You may have already come down on one side or the other, but I don’t think it’s necessary here. The Bible doesn’t clearly take any sides and neither must we. This seems to be one of those cases where the issue was a disagreement in which scriptural principles to emphasize. It was an honest to goodness difference in ministerial philosophy. There seems to have been no sin involved. Despite this dispute and subsequent parting of the ways of two great heroes in the faith, God’s kingdom continued on stronger than ever and both men were used powerfully by God. It is through situations like this, however, that we can learn some very valuable lessons for our own difficult times where issues are so often much more complicated than we would like them to be.
We wish that we didn’t have disagreements among brothers but the reality is that there simply always will be in the present age. Two godly individuals can sharply disagree over the directions of their ministries or whether another brother is ready to be counted on in the ministry, or a nearly endless cavalcade of possibilities but that does not mean that either one is acting in an ungodly manner, even if one or both sides have made mistakes. The reality is that God does not give us answers to every single judgment call that we must make in this age. We will never be free of mistakes and sincere differences of opinions until we all arrive safely in the age to come. Until that time we must firmly bear with one another and “Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace” (Eph. 4:3). There can be differences of opinion and mistakes will be made. That is the reality of the Christian life that we share in together (Phil. 1:6). Many of these differences and even partings of the way will hurt and be painful. Our task, however difficult it may be, is to do what is necessary to keep the bonds of peace and unity through even mistakes.
As Christians we are always called to step forward in love even with those that have hurt us, cursed us, or acted as an enemy. If this is how we are to react to our true enemies, then how much more with our brothers, even when they hurt us or feel like an enemy, or make a rash judgment or offer a harsh word? In fact, when someone most feels like my enemy or has hurt me the most, it is then and to them that I am called by Christ to step forward and show love. Not because I feel like it, but because that is who he is transforming me to be.
There is absolutely no indication or even hint that these two men thought any less of one another although this was surely an emotional time and situation. This was a rupture in their relationship and their ministry. It certainly hurt and could have caused hard feelings but later on we find Paul urging for support for Barnabas in his ministry (1 Cor. 9:6). That verse clearly demonstrates that Paul continued to love, value, and support Barnabas. Just because they could no longer work together did not mean that they did not love one another. Surely Paul and Barnabas made “every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace.”
Although Paul certainly called for Christians to be of one mind in living out the life of Christ and urged that there be no divisions among believers (1 Cor. 1:10-12), that does not mean that there won’t be differences of opinion. It is possible to have differences that even lead to partings of the way without it rupturing the unity and brotherhood of believers. The unity of the family of God must be of higher priority than my opinion or even my brother’s mistakes. That is the Christian life that we all signed up for.
It is significant to note that neither brother is clearly commended or condemned in this parting of the ways. The Bible does not take sides in this issue and we don’t need to either in every situation. That does not mean that we overlook issues or don’t engage in them or help our brothers. It is quite possible, however, to engage in a situation and offer godly input and counsel without taking sides. We can see the right and wrong in both sides of the argument without splitting into different camps. Splitting into different camps is the worldly response to differences of opinion. Commitment to love and unity despite differences and hurt is how the followers of Jesus are to respond.
The separation of Paul and Barnabas might have seemed like a great victory for Satan but that was not the case. Even when we make mistakes, even stupid ones, we must always remember that God is far more powerful than I am stupid. God causes all things to work together for the good of those who love him (Rom. 8:28). That means that if we are all committed to loving God and following him, God can and will work even through our failures and mistakes. We might have disagreements but if we remain righteous even through hard times, God will work powerfully.
In the case of Paul and Barnabas, God took one team of church strengtheners and turned it into two. He doubled the ground that they could cover. It also gave a ministry opportunity to Mark and Silas that might not have been there otherwise. Because of this, more work could be done, more people could engage in the work of the kingdom, and the gospel could be furthered.
It is also true that this disagreement may have been a real struggle and trial for all of those involved, but God uses such situations to teach us strength, perseverance, and to make us complete (Jm. 1:3-4). Even though mistakes may have been made, they could learn from them. Mistakes only become failures when we fail to learn. When we learn from mistakes they become opportunities. For instance, Barnabas may have learned through this disagreement to be more watchful and demanding of Mark which may have had a large hand in the growth that he experienced. Paul may have learned to be more on the look out to be patient and sensitive as he was later in his ministry when it came to the issue between Philemon and Onesimus.
We have shortcomings and we will all fail. The brutal reality is that we all probably have both planks and splinters in our own eyes all of the time. We can play the blame game or we can be active in our unity, brotherhood, forgiveness, growth, and commitment to God’s family. Paul was certainly committed to his decision at the time and it may have worked out for the good, but it is true that he would later change his opinion of Mark. Their disagreement did not cloud his judgment in the future of Mark or their commitment to one another as brothers. He would later call Mark useful and asked that he be brought to help him (1 Tim. 4:11). This must have been very comforting and encouraging for both Mark and Barnabas and a great reminder that they were still brothers in Christ despite their past differences. We will have differences and we will hurt one another; that’s a promise. When the Scriptures call for Christians to bear with one another and forgive one another it is an implicit promise that we will hurt one another. Our love for Christ and our brotherly love can and must triumph.
The mere fact that Luke recorded this sharp disagreement between Paul and Barnabas shows that the church was not ashamed of it. It was a reality and important lessons could be learned. In the same way, we need not be ashamed of differences of opinion or disagreements as though they are all signs of weakness, sin, or disunity. They only become such things when we fail to learn lessons from these times or we fail to put the unity of brotherhood above our own opinion, feelings, and emotions. These are not times to be glossed over and covered up but are times to be openly discussed and learned from in the proper venues for those who are mature enough in their faith to handle such matters.
Devotional Thought
Paul and Barnabas clearly came into conflict but it is also clear that they were both sincerely attempting to put the interests of Christ first. Could you say the same about your relationships and even your conflicts that you come into?
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Acts 15:22-35
22 Then the apostles and elders, with the whole church, decided to choose some of their own men and send them to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. They chose Judas (called Barsabbas) and Silas, men who were leaders among the believers. 23 With them they sent the following letter:
The apostles and elders, your brothers,
To the Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria and Cilicia:
Greetings.
24 We have heard that some went out from us without our authorization and disturbed you, troubling your minds by what they said. 25 So we all agreed to choose some men and send them to you with our dear friends Barnabas and Paul— 26 men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 27 Therefore we are sending Judas and Silas to confirm by word of mouth what we are writing. 28 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: 29 You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things.
Farewell.
30 So the men were sent off and went down to Antioch, where they gathered the church together and delivered the letter. 31 The people read it and were glad for its encouraging message. 32 Judas and Silas, who themselves were prophets, said much to encourage and strengthen the believers. 33 After spending some time there, they were sent off by the believers with the blessing of peace to return to those who had sent them. [34] [d] 35 But Paul and Barnabas remained in Antioch, where they and many others taught and preached the word of the Lord.
Dig Deeper
Teachers and schools are notorious for giving their students long lists of rules that they have to follow. Some classrooms and schools have long lists of rules that each student must remember and follow each day while at school. I suppose that rules serve a purpose at times and can be quite helpful but there is also a downside to rules. Students who learn only to follow rules rarely learn how to actually think and discern through situations themselves. They will be quite prone to looking for loopholes in the rules and when they find themselves in situations outside of the prescribed rules they are generally at quite a loss. Rules tend to serve the purpose of conforming behavior and controlling people in the immediate moment. Rules are good controllers and conformers, but they are bad trainers and transformers. People who just learn to follow rules, you see, don’t usually mature and progress past those rules. They learn to follow those rules and that’s it. But they don’t learn how to think and live rightly regardless of the situation.
That’s why when I was a teacher I always had but one rule: You must show respect at all times for everyone else in this room. When you think about it that’s not much of a rule. That’s certainly not a rule that you can follow mindlessly. It is actually a guideline more than a rule. Guidelines are far more demanding than rules because they offer some general principles and then demand the one following them to really stop and think and learn from each situation. When different scenarios come up you must care enough about following the guideline and hold it as an important conviction to do the work of thinking through what it means to follow this guideline in this situation. As one does that more and more they grow and learn and mature. Rules teach you how to follow. Guidelines teach you how to think Surely if you give someone a rule you teach them how to act for a day but if you teach them to think through guidelines you teach them how to live for a lifetime.
This is exactly the kind of people that God has always promised that he would have: a thinking people. This is precisely what the prophet Jeremiah spoke of when he declared that “’The days are coming’, declares the LORD, ‘when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them’, declares the LORD. ‘This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time’, declares the LORD. ‘I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the LORD,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest’, declares the LORD. ‘For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more’” (Jer. 31:31-34). The point was that in the new covenant God would have a people that wouldn’t be just a bunch of followers of rules who would have to go and tell one another the rules and admonish one another to follow them. He would have a people who had chosen to be his people and in whom he had placed his own transforming Spirit. These people would know the Lord through intimacy and experience and would learn to think there way through situations.
It is for this very reason that the New Testament has precious few examples of actual rules. Instead we find mostly guidelines, principles, and suggestions which forced God’s people to think, to love, and to work out what it meant to be devoted to God and live together with other believers as his family. As the early church began to take on the difficult task of being the unified family that Jesus had called them to be, we find at the most difficult moments like these, that the directions given were not rules but were all about teaching the church how to think through the ongoing task of loving one another.
As the Council in Jerusalem convened, they knew that getting word back to the other churches was vital, especially to the center of the Gentile mission, the church in Antioch. But they also knew that if they simply sent Paul and Barnabas back to carry the decision of the leaders in Jerusalem that it could put them in an awkward situation which would leave them open to questions of whether they had faithfully communicated what had really been decided. To ensure that something like that didn’t happen, the brothers chose Judas and Silas, who were already well-respected brothers, to represent the church in Jerusalem and carry out this momentous decision to the larger Christian family.
There was obviously much confusion as men had come not that along ago and created havoc in Antioch by taking it upon themselves to drive a wedge between Jewish and Gentile table fellowship amongst the brothers. They had evidently either believed that they had some measure of authority from James and the Jerusalem church to do this or attempted to give the impression that they did. But the letter makes it clear from the beginning that these conservatives had stepped beyond their rightful authority. They were not speaking on behalf of James and the church in Jerusalem (a fact of which Paul was quite probably unaware when he wrote the letter to the Galatians but a matter which was now cleared up once-for-all).
The opening of the letter gives a further clue as to where it is heading when it says that they chose some men to verify the truth of the letter and to accompany their dear friends or more literally the “beloved” Barnabas and Paul. That must have put the brothers and sisters in Antioch at ease right away and allowed them a big sigh of relief. Paul and Barnabas were beloved Christians who were not leading them astray but guiding them into the truth of God’s family in the Messiah.
What is not certain is whether Luke has given us a word-by-word rendering of the original letter or an abridged version but he does include a phrase that has always been one of my favorites. The letter says that what they decided upon “seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us.” Christianity is a life that is the constant struggles of people of all different types learning to live together as one family. That simply cannot be defined by rules. But that also means the challenge of listening to the guidance of the Holy Spirit, working together to find solutions to thorny issues for which there is no rule or easy answer, and then making a decision as best you can. The council made no attempt to present themselves as infallible or even that they had the incontrovertibly correct answer. They were simply doing the best they could and making decisions based on what seemed right to them as they attempted to discern God’s will through the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
As we saw in the previous passage, the agreement contained three specific areas in which they were asking Gentile Christians to be especially observant as they sought to live the holy lives of God’s family and avoid anything that might needlessly offend their Jewish Christian brothers and even non-Christian Jews with whom they might be living closely. There is much in the way of freedoms in Christ but where freedom and unity clashed, unity should always win. That is why Paul declared in his letter to the Galatians that they should “not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love. For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’” (Gal. 5:13-14). All three categories discussed by Paul had to do with the way that Gentiles normally lived (the prohibition on sexual immorality probably referred more to aberrant marriage practices that were abhorrent to Jews) and as 1 Corinthians 6-10 demonstrates these weren’t simple straightforward rules. To carry out even these simple suggestions would take love, wisdom, discernment, and of course, the guidance of the Holy Spirit. These three guidelines are not comprehensive Leviticus-style rules. They are guidelines that would involve a great deal of thinking and love for one another.
The letter was obviously encouraging to the church in Antioch and Gentile believers around the world. God’s promise of having one family of all nations had overcome a stiff early challenge and would take a little time to enjoy the gifts that God had given to one another as Judas and Silas stayed for a bit to encourage the believers in Antioch.
There are two other important things that shouldn’t be missed with the sending out of this letter. The first was that the issue of the family of God as far as it concerned Gentiles being recognized was settled. The conservatives had lost and it had been recognized once-and-for-all that the Gentiles would need nothing more than entering into Christ to be part of God’s family. It would still take a long time to work out all of the details of how to do that on a day-to-day basis but the important part was now decided. The other thing to note is that the Jerusalem church calls the Gentiles to live lovingly towards their brothers but never binds these as rules. They would “do well” to follow them and of course if they really loved God and his family then they would have no problem with these things but it never binds these things as rules. It was about the heart and not rules. They were learning to live for a lifetime not for a day.
Devotional Thought
Do you really embrace the hard work of thinking through and living out the call for Christians to love one another and put the interests of others ahead of our own or do you tend to seek the easy way out by falling back on fulfilling the obligations of a few things that you have turned into rules? For instance, do you have time with God every morning or meet with other believers because you have truly thought through the implications of what those things mean to do or not do or do you just muddle through them as an obligation? Take some time today to truly think about what you do and why you do it.
The apostles and elders, your brothers,
To the Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria and Cilicia:
Greetings.
24 We have heard that some went out from us without our authorization and disturbed you, troubling your minds by what they said. 25 So we all agreed to choose some men and send them to you with our dear friends Barnabas and Paul— 26 men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 27 Therefore we are sending Judas and Silas to confirm by word of mouth what we are writing. 28 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: 29 You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things.
Farewell.
30 So the men were sent off and went down to Antioch, where they gathered the church together and delivered the letter. 31 The people read it and were glad for its encouraging message. 32 Judas and Silas, who themselves were prophets, said much to encourage and strengthen the believers. 33 After spending some time there, they were sent off by the believers with the blessing of peace to return to those who had sent them. [34] [d] 35 But Paul and Barnabas remained in Antioch, where they and many others taught and preached the word of the Lord.
Dig Deeper
Teachers and schools are notorious for giving their students long lists of rules that they have to follow. Some classrooms and schools have long lists of rules that each student must remember and follow each day while at school. I suppose that rules serve a purpose at times and can be quite helpful but there is also a downside to rules. Students who learn only to follow rules rarely learn how to actually think and discern through situations themselves. They will be quite prone to looking for loopholes in the rules and when they find themselves in situations outside of the prescribed rules they are generally at quite a loss. Rules tend to serve the purpose of conforming behavior and controlling people in the immediate moment. Rules are good controllers and conformers, but they are bad trainers and transformers. People who just learn to follow rules, you see, don’t usually mature and progress past those rules. They learn to follow those rules and that’s it. But they don’t learn how to think and live rightly regardless of the situation.
That’s why when I was a teacher I always had but one rule: You must show respect at all times for everyone else in this room. When you think about it that’s not much of a rule. That’s certainly not a rule that you can follow mindlessly. It is actually a guideline more than a rule. Guidelines are far more demanding than rules because they offer some general principles and then demand the one following them to really stop and think and learn from each situation. When different scenarios come up you must care enough about following the guideline and hold it as an important conviction to do the work of thinking through what it means to follow this guideline in this situation. As one does that more and more they grow and learn and mature. Rules teach you how to follow. Guidelines teach you how to think Surely if you give someone a rule you teach them how to act for a day but if you teach them to think through guidelines you teach them how to live for a lifetime.
This is exactly the kind of people that God has always promised that he would have: a thinking people. This is precisely what the prophet Jeremiah spoke of when he declared that “’The days are coming’, declares the LORD, ‘when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them’, declares the LORD. ‘This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time’, declares the LORD. ‘I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the LORD,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest’, declares the LORD. ‘For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more’” (Jer. 31:31-34). The point was that in the new covenant God would have a people that wouldn’t be just a bunch of followers of rules who would have to go and tell one another the rules and admonish one another to follow them. He would have a people who had chosen to be his people and in whom he had placed his own transforming Spirit. These people would know the Lord through intimacy and experience and would learn to think there way through situations.
It is for this very reason that the New Testament has precious few examples of actual rules. Instead we find mostly guidelines, principles, and suggestions which forced God’s people to think, to love, and to work out what it meant to be devoted to God and live together with other believers as his family. As the early church began to take on the difficult task of being the unified family that Jesus had called them to be, we find at the most difficult moments like these, that the directions given were not rules but were all about teaching the church how to think through the ongoing task of loving one another.
As the Council in Jerusalem convened, they knew that getting word back to the other churches was vital, especially to the center of the Gentile mission, the church in Antioch. But they also knew that if they simply sent Paul and Barnabas back to carry the decision of the leaders in Jerusalem that it could put them in an awkward situation which would leave them open to questions of whether they had faithfully communicated what had really been decided. To ensure that something like that didn’t happen, the brothers chose Judas and Silas, who were already well-respected brothers, to represent the church in Jerusalem and carry out this momentous decision to the larger Christian family.
There was obviously much confusion as men had come not that along ago and created havoc in Antioch by taking it upon themselves to drive a wedge between Jewish and Gentile table fellowship amongst the brothers. They had evidently either believed that they had some measure of authority from James and the Jerusalem church to do this or attempted to give the impression that they did. But the letter makes it clear from the beginning that these conservatives had stepped beyond their rightful authority. They were not speaking on behalf of James and the church in Jerusalem (a fact of which Paul was quite probably unaware when he wrote the letter to the Galatians but a matter which was now cleared up once-for-all).
The opening of the letter gives a further clue as to where it is heading when it says that they chose some men to verify the truth of the letter and to accompany their dear friends or more literally the “beloved” Barnabas and Paul. That must have put the brothers and sisters in Antioch at ease right away and allowed them a big sigh of relief. Paul and Barnabas were beloved Christians who were not leading them astray but guiding them into the truth of God’s family in the Messiah.
What is not certain is whether Luke has given us a word-by-word rendering of the original letter or an abridged version but he does include a phrase that has always been one of my favorites. The letter says that what they decided upon “seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us.” Christianity is a life that is the constant struggles of people of all different types learning to live together as one family. That simply cannot be defined by rules. But that also means the challenge of listening to the guidance of the Holy Spirit, working together to find solutions to thorny issues for which there is no rule or easy answer, and then making a decision as best you can. The council made no attempt to present themselves as infallible or even that they had the incontrovertibly correct answer. They were simply doing the best they could and making decisions based on what seemed right to them as they attempted to discern God’s will through the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
As we saw in the previous passage, the agreement contained three specific areas in which they were asking Gentile Christians to be especially observant as they sought to live the holy lives of God’s family and avoid anything that might needlessly offend their Jewish Christian brothers and even non-Christian Jews with whom they might be living closely. There is much in the way of freedoms in Christ but where freedom and unity clashed, unity should always win. That is why Paul declared in his letter to the Galatians that they should “not use your freedom to indulge the flesh; rather, serve one another humbly in love. For the entire law is fulfilled in keeping this one command: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’” (Gal. 5:13-14). All three categories discussed by Paul had to do with the way that Gentiles normally lived (the prohibition on sexual immorality probably referred more to aberrant marriage practices that were abhorrent to Jews) and as 1 Corinthians 6-10 demonstrates these weren’t simple straightforward rules. To carry out even these simple suggestions would take love, wisdom, discernment, and of course, the guidance of the Holy Spirit. These three guidelines are not comprehensive Leviticus-style rules. They are guidelines that would involve a great deal of thinking and love for one another.
The letter was obviously encouraging to the church in Antioch and Gentile believers around the world. God’s promise of having one family of all nations had overcome a stiff early challenge and would take a little time to enjoy the gifts that God had given to one another as Judas and Silas stayed for a bit to encourage the believers in Antioch.
There are two other important things that shouldn’t be missed with the sending out of this letter. The first was that the issue of the family of God as far as it concerned Gentiles being recognized was settled. The conservatives had lost and it had been recognized once-and-for-all that the Gentiles would need nothing more than entering into Christ to be part of God’s family. It would still take a long time to work out all of the details of how to do that on a day-to-day basis but the important part was now decided. The other thing to note is that the Jerusalem church calls the Gentiles to live lovingly towards their brothers but never binds these as rules. They would “do well” to follow them and of course if they really loved God and his family then they would have no problem with these things but it never binds these things as rules. It was about the heart and not rules. They were learning to live for a lifetime not for a day.
Devotional Thought
Do you really embrace the hard work of thinking through and living out the call for Christians to love one another and put the interests of others ahead of our own or do you tend to seek the easy way out by falling back on fulfilling the obligations of a few things that you have turned into rules? For instance, do you have time with God every morning or meet with other believers because you have truly thought through the implications of what those things mean to do or not do or do you just muddle through them as an obligation? Take some time today to truly think about what you do and why you do it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)